Testing Patrick Ruffini’s Model in Grand Rapids

Patrick Ruffini sees the leading GOP candidates carrying the banner for three distinct camps in the Republican Party.

“Despite the different actors and alliances in different states, we are beginning to see the real dividing lines of this campaign. It’s the battle of the moderates (McCain), metro conservatives (Romney), and rural conservatives (Huckabee). Stripped of all other hangers-on (Fred, and increasingly, Rudy), nationwide this divide seems to work out to about 40-40-20, or 35-40-25. Conservatives ought to be winning this battle, but Huckabee’s lock on the rural vote (just 16% of the vote in Charleston County, btw) will prevent any kind of clear two-man race before February 5th. Every day that Huckabee’s nice guy act is allowed to continue is a gift to John McCain — and he knows it.

“Mitt Romney is fast becoming the candidate of conservatives in the suburbs and the exurbs. In Michigan, he dominated Oakland and Macomb counties with 46% of the vote in a multi-candidate field. In Nevada, he won most convincingly in Clark County. In Iowa, he did better in Des Moines than elsewhere in the state.

“The Romney and McCain coalitions also overlap. They represent two different sides of the establishment coin, with McCain representing an older, mainline establishment — the Republican Party of Gerry Ford, Howard Baker, and Bob Dole — and Romney representing the brasher, post-Reagan establishment that was built on the tax issue and whose alliance with modern-day Huckabee voters allowed them to take control of the party in 1994.”

I agree with Ruffini’s analysis of Romney — Most of the Republicans I know from Montgomery County, Md. or Fairfield County, Ct. are supporting him. I also think he hits the nail on the head for Huckabee — He clearly is a favorite among rural, religious voters. But McCain is a more difficult candidate to figure out. He’s done well in the suburban counties like Charleston, S.C. but also in areas where the religious Right has a strong presence like western Michigan.

The most interesting county nationwide may have been Kent County, Mich., home of Grand Rapids. As Gerald Ford’s hometown, it’s where his presidential library and Gerald Ford International Airport are located. Ford’s legacy is still strong in Grand Rapids, so by Ruffini’s analysis, McCain should have had an upper hand there. But Grand Rapids is also a very religious and culturally conservative county and has a very strong Dutch Reformed Church presence. Many pundits thought this fact would play well for Huckabee.

But it was Romney, and not McCain or Huckabee, who won Grand Rapids. Romney took 38% to McCain’s 31%. It’s a suburban county, so Ruffini’s analysis works, but the county has enough demographics cutting different ways to make it interesting.

Republican Primary in Grand Rapids




3 responses to “Testing Patrick Ruffini’s Model in Grand Rapids

  1. Limbaugh says that either McCain or Huckabee would destroy the GOP. I don’t agree with Rush on much of anything, but he’s right on this. That said, however, the Republicans will have a turnout problem in the general election. With either Clinton or Obama at the top of the ticket Democrats are going to have a vastly increased turnout. This is like JFK in 1960. Without a candidate who panders to the “Christian” bigots the Republicans are going to lose the turnout that gave them victories under Reagan and George W Bush. McCain might be the best deal for Republicans because he can peel off many Democrats and Independents who care about national security, and he probably would not piss off Republicans from affluent suburbs the way Huckabee would. Underlying Limbaugh’s statement may be a realization that the Republican coalition is dead. If Huckabee is anything he is a bridge back to the Democratic populists like William J Bryan of the late 19th and early 20th century who hated both wealth and furriners, a term which included American Jews and Catholics then and now apparently includes Mormons and homosexuals.

  2. Great comments.

    Someone in Michigan made this point to me: As Evangelicals go, the Dutch Reformed are a lot different than Southern Baptists. Being a little less doctrinaire, I think they’d be more likely to go for an issues candidate like Romney rather than a pure identity candidate like Huckabee.

  3. Pingback: The Five Places McCain Should Go « The Electoral Map

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s